📌 TOPINDIATOURS Eksklusif ai: Claude Code costs up to $200 a month. Goose does the

The artificial intelligence coding revolution comes with a catch: it's expensive.

Claude Code, Anthropic's terminal-based AI agent that can write, debug, and deploy code autonomously, has captured the imagination of software developers worldwide. But its pricing — ranging from $20 to $200 per month depending on usage — has sparked a growing rebellion among the very programmers it aims to serve.

Now, a free alternative is gaining traction. Goose, an open-source AI agent developed by Block (the financial technology company formerly known as Square), offers nearly identical functionality to Claude Code but runs entirely on a user's local machine. No subscription fees. No cloud dependency. No rate limits that reset every five hours.

"Your data stays with you, period," said Parth Sareen, a software engineer who demonstrated the tool during a recent livestream. The comment captures the core appeal: Goose gives developers complete control over their AI-powered workflow, including the ability to work offline — even on an airplane.

The project has exploded in popularity. Goose now boasts more than 26,100 stars on GitHub, the code-sharing platform, with 362 contributors and 102 releases since its launch. The latest version, 1.20.1, shipped on January 19, 2026, reflecting a development pace that rivals commercial products.

For developers frustrated by Claude Code's pricing structure and usage caps, Goose represents something increasingly rare in the AI industry: a genuinely free, no-strings-attached option for serious work.

Anthropic's new rate limits spark a developer revolt

To understand why Goose matters, you need to understand the Claude Code pricing controversy.

Anthropic, the San Francisco artificial intelligence company founded by former OpenAI executives, offers Claude Code as part of its subscription tiers. The free plan provides no access whatsoever. The Pro plan, at $17 per month with annual billing (or $20 monthly), limits users to just 10 to 40 prompts every five hours — a constraint that serious developers exhaust within minutes of intensive work.

The Max plans, at $100 and $200 per month, offer more headroom: 50 to 200 prompts and 200 to 800 prompts respectively, plus access to Anthropic's most powerful model, Claude 4.5 Opus. But even these premium tiers come with restrictions that have inflamed the developer community.

In late July, Anthropic announced new weekly rate limits. Under the system, Pro users receive 40 to 80 hours of Sonnet 4 usage per week. Max users at the $200 tier get 240 to 480 hours of Sonnet 4, plus 24 to 40 hours of Opus 4. Nearly five months later, the frustration has not subsided.

The problem? Those "hours" are not actual hours. They represent token-based limits that vary wildly depending on codebase size, conversation length, and the complexity of the code being processed. Independent analysis suggests the actual per-session limits translate to roughly 44,000 tokens for Pro users and 220,000 tokens for the $200 Max plan.

"It's confusing and vague," one developer wrote in a widely shared analysis. "When they say '24-40 hours of Opus 4,' that doesn't really tell you anything useful about what you're actually getting."

The backlash on Reddit and developer forums has been fierce. Some users report hitting their daily limits within 30 minutes of intensive coding. Others have canceled their subscriptions entirely, calling the new restrictions "a joke" and "unusable for real work."

Anthropic has defended the changes, stating that the limits affect fewer than five percent of users and target people running Claude Code "continuously in the background, 24/7." But the company has not clarified whether that figure refers to five percent of Max subscribers or five percent of all users — a distinction that matters enormously.

How Block built a free AI coding agent that works offline

Goose takes a radically different approach to the same problem.

Built by Block, the payments company led by Jack Dorsey, Goose is what engineers call an "on-machine AI agent." Unlike Claude Code, which sends your queries to Anthropic's servers for processing, Goose can run entirely on your local computer using open-source language models that you download and control yourself.

The project's documentation describes it as going "beyond code suggestions" to "install, execute, edit, and test with any LLM." That last phrase — "any LLM" — is the key differentiator. Goose is model-agnostic by design.

You can connect Goose to Anthropic's Claude models if you have API access. You can use OpenAI's GPT-5 or Google's Gemini. You can route it through services like Groq or OpenRouter. Or — and this is where things get interesting — you can run it entirely locally using tools like Ollama, which let you download and execute open-source models on your own hardware.

The practical implications are significant. With a local setup, there are no subscription fees, no usage caps, no rate limits, and no concerns about your code being sent to external servers. Your conversations with the AI never leave your machine.

"I use Ollama all the time on planes — it's a lot of fun!" Sareen noted during a demonstration, highlighting how local models free developers from the constraints of internet connectivity.

What Goose can do that traditional code assistants can't

Goose operates as a command-line tool or desktop application that can autonomously perform complex development tasks. It can build entire projects from scratch, write and execute code, debug failures, orchestrate workflows across multiple files, and interact with external APIs — all without constant human oversight.

The architecture relies on what the AI industry calls "tool calling" or "<a href="https://platform.openai…

Konten dipersingkat otomatis.

🔗 Sumber: venturebeat.com

📌 TOPINDIATOURS Update ai: 2,100-year-old Greek bullet with sarcastic inscribed me

A 2,100-year-old sling bullet with a sarcastic inscribed message “learn” attached was found in the holy land, on the eastern shore of the Sea of Galilee in Israel.

“Learn your lesson,” “learn never to come back here,” whatever the cryptic “learn” referred to, the Greek defenders of the city of Hippos delivered a message to the Hasmonean army of King Alexander Jannaeus along with a fatal blow.

Just published in the peer-reviewed journal “Palestine Exploration Quarterly” last week, the authors described the discovery of a “unique” lead sling bullet on an ancient road. Most likely, it had been launched at attackers advancing towards the city, with this menacing message in Greek: ΜΑΘΟΥ.

The find joins a group of 69 lead sling bullets uncovered at Hippos in 26 years. Whereas others feature a scorpion or a thunderbolt, this rare bullet is the first one that archaeologists have uncovered with a “sassy” reply to an army seeking to capture the city — like, “nice try.”

First inscribed sling bullet ever discovered

Researchers from the University of Haifa were excavating a Roman necropolis near Hippos when they uncovered a lead bullet, about 1.3 inches long and weighing just under a pound, according to the study.

As an archaeologist on the project said, these types of sling bullets are well known in the Hellenistic period, as they were one of the most common weapons used, as they were cheap and effective, according to The Times of Israel. “But this is the first in the world to bear the inscription,” as stated in Live Science.

The inscription would have sent enemies quite an impression as it was burned into the stone with molten lead, as if daring the attackers to continue their useless advance, Live Science continues.  “This represents local sarcastic humor…” wishing to “teach their enemies a lesson with a wink.” So, some kind of early emoji.

Others, as The Times of Israel reports, these types of munitions in the Israel-Syrian region bore groups of thunderbolts tied up together to symbolize a sledgehammer coming from Zeus, or a trident, to align their force with the power of god, but this word “learn” intended to deliver a different tone.

Stay away, it’s a good idea from you

Archaeologists continued that the construction of the word would suggest that the stone was speaking to the enemy army, “I’m learning,” to hit you. So the bullet communicated to the enemy that they should not come here —they will be sorry that they did. Other inscriptions have been found, such as “catch,” as in “catch this.”

Study authors said,  “The letters may be better understood in connection with another convention for sling bullet inscriptions, also attested in Iudaea-Palaestina. The sling bullets linked to the military actions of Diodotus (Tryphon) from Kasiane in the second century BCE carry sarcastic inscriptions, the sort commonly found on these projectiles, addressed to the enemy: γϵῦσαι, ‘take a taste’. Even in Homer, γϵύομαι can mean ‘to experience’ a blow, as Weiß points out.  Other examples of the mocking battle slogans are δέξαι (‘Receive this!’) and λαβέ (‘Take it!’).

And, according to what archaeologists can detect, the bullet did hit something, but what? They can’t confirm. “We don’t know if it was a rock or a person, but there was definitely an impact,” Haifa University’s Michael Eisenberg concluded in The Times of Israel.

🔗 Sumber: interestingengineering.com