📌 TOPINDIATOURS Update ai: Top AI Industry Figures Secretly Hoping AI Will Wipe Ou

It’s probably not a shock to you that the people leading the AI industry don’t have your best interests at heart. But what if we told you that some of them are actually pretty okay with humanity being subjugated, replaced, or wiped out, by the machines they’re creating?

In an essay for the Wall Street Journal, author David A. Price calls the tech figures in this camp the “cheerful apocalyptics.” And their philosophy seems to be that, whatever happens, advanced artificial life forms should be let loose — and if they surpass us, then so be it.

“I was used to thinking of AI leaders and researchers in terms of two camps: on one hand, optimists who believed it’s no problem to ‘align’ AI models with human interests,” Price wrote, “and on the other, doomers who wanted to call a time-out before wayward superintelligent AIs exterminate us.”

“Now here was this third type of person, asking, what’s the big deal, anyway?”

The cheerful apocalyptics have a distinguished advocate: Richard Sutton, one of the AI field’s leading researchers and last year’s recipient of the Turing Award, the most prestigious prize in computer science.

In an interview, Sutton compared creating AI to having children.

“When you have a child,” Sutton told the WSJ, “would you want a button that if they do the wrong thing, you can turn them off? That’s much of the discussion about AI. It’s just assumed we want to be able to control them.”

Sutton argued that there’s nothing “sacred” about humankind and our squishy, biological form of life. Most species go extinct, and humans are no exception. “We are the most interesting part of the universe right now,” he said. But there might come a time “when we’re no longer the most interesting part.”

“If it was really true that we were holding the universe back from being the best universe that it could, I think it would be OK,” Sutton mused.

Sutton is a revered figure in the field, but he’s not someone calling the shots at big tech firms, or designing their AI models.

But to get a peek behind the curtains, we turn to Jaron Lanier, a founding figure in the field of VR technology and an outspoken critic of Silicon Valley. As someone deeply embedded in tech circles, he tells the WSJ that many AI researchers complain that people are too committed to human species.

“There’s a feeling that people can’t be trusted on this topic because they are infested with a reprehensible mind virus,” Lanier told the WSJ, “which causes them to favor people over AI when clearly what we should do is get out of the way.”

“The number of people who hold that belief is small,” Lanier added, “but they happen to be positioned in stations of great influence. So it’s not something one can ignore.”

Another proponent may be Larry Page, the cofounder and former CEO of Google. At a birthday party for Elon Musk in 2015, he argued that “digital life is the natural and desirable next step” in “cosmic evolution,” recalled MIT professor Max Tegmark in his book “Life 3.0,” per the WSJ.

Other proponents are more forward about their pro-AI position. Take Daniel Faggella, an AI entrepreneur who argues that the purpose of developing the tech should be to create a “worthy successor” to humankind.

“The eternal locus of all moral value and volition until the heat death of the universe will not be f*cking opposable thumbs,” Faggella told the WSJ.

There’s a pretty critical flaw in all of this: the proponents at once portray humanity as an expendable stepping-stone towards superior artificial lifeforms, but also presuppose that humans and other intelligent and conscious being have an inherently important role in the grand scheme of the cosmos — that role being the stepping stone. So why is this a cosmic imperative? Ultimately, it feels like arguing over the mechanics of your favorite fantasy or sci-fi world; it has no meaningful impact on the present reality, which is rather convenient, since the current picture of how the AI industry is shaping the world is unbelievably grim, from its disastrous environmental toll to entrenching surveillance to how its products are driving many of its users off the deep end.

With all that in mind, it should you alarm you that this kind of technological misanthropy has a foothold in the AI world.

More on AI: Stalker Already Using OpenAI’s Sora 2 to Harass Victim

The post Top AI Industry Figures Secretly Hoping AI Will Wipe Out Humankind appeared first on Futurism.

🔗 Sumber: futurism.com

📌 TOPINDIATOURS Eksklusif ai: OpenAI unveils AgentKit that lets developers drag an

OpenAI launched an agent builder that the company hopes will eliminate fragmented tools and make it easier for enterprises to utilize OpenAI’s system to create agents.

AgentKit, announced during OpenAI’s DevDay in San Francisco, enables developers and enterprises to build agents and add chat capabilities in one place, potentially competing with platforms like Zapier.

By offering a more streamlined way to create agents, OpenAI advances further into becoming a full-stack application provider.

“Until now, building agents meant juggling fragmented tools—complex orchestration with no versioning, custom connectors, manual eval pipelines, prompt tuning, and weeks of frontend work before launch,” the company said in a blog post.

AgentKit includes:

• Agent Builder, which is a visual canvas where devs can see what they’ve created and versioning multi-agent workflows

• Connector Registry is a central area for admins to manage connections across OpenAI products. A Global Admin console will be a prerequisite to using this feature.

• ChatKit enables users to integrate chat-based agents into their user interfaces.

Eventually, OpenAI said it will build a standalone Workflows API and add agent deployment tabs to ChatGPT.

OpenAI also expanded evaluation for agents, adding capabilities such as datasets with automated graders and annotations, trace grading that runs end-to-end assessments of workflows, automated prompt optimization, and support for third-party agent measurement tools.

Developers can access some features of AgentKit, but OpenAI is gradually rolling out additional features, such as Agent Builder. Currently, Agent Builder is available in beta, while ChatKit and new evaluation capabilities are generally available. Connector Registry “is beginning its beta rollout to some API and ChatGPT Enterprise and Edu users.

OpenAI said pricing for AgentKit tools will be included in the standard API model pricing.

Agent Builder

To clarify, many agents are built using OpenAI’s models; however, enterprises often access GPT-5 through other platforms to create their own agents. However, AgentKit brings enterprises more into its ecosystem, ensuring they don’t need to tap other platforms as often.

Demonstrated during DevDay, the company stated that Agent Builder is ideal for rapid iteration. It also provides developers with visibility into how the agents are working.

During the demo, an OpenAI developer made an agent that reads the DevDay agenda and suggests panels to watch. It took her just under eight minutes.

Other model providers saw the importance of offering developer toolkits to build agents to entice enterprises to use more of their tools. Google came out with its Agent Development Kit in April, expanding multi-agent system building “in under 100 lines of code.” Microsoft, which runs the popular agent framework AutoGen, announced it is bringing agent creation to one place with its new Agent Framework.

OpenAI customers, such as the fintech company Ramp, stated in a blog post that its teams were able to build a procurement agent in a few hours instead of months.

“Agent Builder transformed what once took months of complex orchestration, custom code, and manual optimizations into just a couple of hours. The visual canvas keeps product, legal, and engineering on the same page, slashing iteration cycles by 70% and getting an agent live in two sprints rather than two quarters,” Ramp said.

AgentKit’s Connector Registry would also enable enterprises to manage and maintain data across workspaces, consolidating data sources into a single panel that spans both ChatGPT and the API. It will have pre-built connectors to Dropbox, Google Drive, SharePoint and Microsoft Teams. It also supports third-party MCP servers.

Another capability of Agent Builder is Guardrails, an open-source safety layer that protects against the leakage of personally identifiable information (PII), jailbreaks, and unintended or malicious behavior.

Bringing more chat

Since most agentic interactions involve chat, it makes sense to simplify the process for developers to set up chat interfaces and connect them with the agents they’ve just built.

“Deploying chat UIs for agents can be surprisingly complex—handling streaming responses, managing threads, showing the model thinking and designing engaging in-chat experiences,” OpenAI said.

The company said ChatKit makes it simple to embed chat agents on platforms and embed these into apps or websites.

However, some OpenAI competitors have begun thinking beyond the chatbot and want to offer agentic interactions that feel more seamless. Google’s asynchronous coding agent, Jules, has introduced a new feature that enables users to interact with the agent through the command-line interface, eliminating the need to open a chat window.

Responses

The response to AgentKit has mainly been positive, with some developers noting that while it simplifies agent building, it doesn’t mean that everyone can now build agents.

Several developers view Agent Kit not as a Zapier killer, but rather as a tool that complements the pipeline.

Zapier debuted a no-code tool for building AI agents and bots, called Zapier Central, in 2024.

🔗 Sumber: venturebeat.com